Students’ Algebraic Thinking Ability Based on Gender
Main Article Content
Abstract
Algebraic thinking plays a fundamental role in developing students’ mathematical reasoning, particularly in recognizing patterns, representing relationships, and generalizing mathematical ideas. This study aims to describe students’ algebraic thinking abilities based on gender and to determine whether there is a significant difference between male and female students. The research employed a descriptive comparative method involving eighth-grade students as the sample, selected using total sampling. Data were collected through a written test designed to measure key components of algebraic thinking, including generational, transformational, and meta-global abilities. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and inferential statistics through the Mann–Whitney U test. The results indicate that male students’ algebraic thinking ability is categorized as moderate, with an average score of 51.48, while female students demonstrate a higher level of ability categorized as good, with an average score of 61.53 (as shown in the results table on page 5). Female students outperform male students across all components of algebraic thinking, particularly in transformational abilities. Statistical analysis reveals a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05), indicating that gender influences students’ algebraic thinking performance. The findings suggest that female students tend to be more accurate, systematic, and careful in solving algebraic problems, while male students are more likely to rely on arithmetic or intuitive approaches. This study highlights the importance of designing instructional strategies that support the development of algebraic thinking for all students while considering gender differences. Further research is recommended to explore effective teaching approaches that enhance students’ algebraic thinking skills comprehensively.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Amerom, B. A. V. (2002). Reinvention Of Early Algebra. Utrecht: CD-ß Press.
Amir, M. Z. Z. (2013). Perspektif Gender Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Marwah. 12, (1), 14-31.
Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math-Gender Strereotypes in Elementary School Children. Child Development, 82, (3), 766-779.
Giyanti, G., et al. (2024). Factor analysis of algebraic thinking skills. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 11(4).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v11i4.79362
Hayati, L. (2013). Pembelajaran Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar Siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika 9 November 2013. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UNY.
Irvaniyah, I., & Akbar, R. O. (2014). Analisis Kecerdasan Matematis dan Kecerdasan Linguistik Siswa Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin. Eduma, 3, (1),138-159.
Jamil, N. B., Rosli, R. B., Mahmud, M. S., & Hasim, S. B. M. (2025). Transformative teaching strategies for algebraic thinking: A systematic review of cognitive, pedagogical, and curricular advances. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(10), em2721.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17250
Kieran, Carolyn. (2004). Algebraic Thinking in the Early Grades: What Is it?. The Mathematics Educator. 8, (1), 139-151.
Kurniyasih, N., & Nugraheni, E. A. (2023). Algebra reasoning ability viewed from student gender differences. Mathline, 8(3), 1091–1104.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v8i3.476
Levin, M., & Walkoe, J. (2022). Seeds of algebraic thinking: A Knowledge in Pieces perspective on the development of algebraic thinking. ZDM Mathematics Education, 54, 1303–1314.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01374-2
Murtiyasa, B. (2015). Tantangan pembelajaran matematika era global (pp. 28–47).
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. USA: NCTM.
Nafi’an , M. l. (2011). Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Ditinjau Dari Gender Di Sekolah Dasar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika 3 Desember 2011. Yogyakarta: UNESA.
Ningrum, K. N., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2013). Profil Penalaran Permasalahan Analogi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender. Jurnal pendidikan matematika, 3, (2), 1-9.
Putri, Z. Y. (2025). Learning Activity with Problem-Based Learning Using Student Worksheet Assisted by MathCityMap to Improve Students’ Mathematical Literacy . Hayati : Journal of Education, 1(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.69836/hayati.v1i2.475
Riduan, M. B. A. (2013). Dasar-dasar statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ristamala, Z. T., & Khulasoh, S. (2026). Implementation of Digital-Based Educational Supervision in the Era of School Technology Transformation. Hayati : Journal of Education, 2(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.69836/hayati.v2i1.664
Rizki, H. T. N., Anwar, Y. S., & Suhaedi, S. (2014). Komparasi Prestasi Belajar Matematika Berdasarkan Gender. Jurnal Media Pendidikan Matematika, 2, (2), 356-363.
Safitri, R., & Masduki. (2023). Exploring secondary students' algebraic thinking in terms of intuitive cognitive style. EduMa.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v12i2.13568
Sudijono, A. (2004). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.