Environment Destruction in Indonesia: The Effectiveness of Indonesia’s Environment Law (Legal Sociology Perspective)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The enjoyment and utilization of the environment is the right of the people of Indonesia as guaranteed under the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Therefore, the Government of the Republic of Indonesia issued Law Number 32 of 2009 on the Protection and Management of Environment (Environment Law) as the embodiment of the rights of the people of Indonesia to enjoy and utilize the environment. As time flew by, the execution of the Environment Law encountered issues due to violations toward said law, such as environment destruction in the form of land clearing by means of burning. Since the issuance of the Environment Law, violations have been carried out by several parties, including but not limited to law enforcers, business owners, and the people of Indonesia themselves. This research focuses on the prohibition toward environment destruction in the form of land clearing by means of burning as well as the reasons and the sociological factors affecting the effectiveness of the implementation of the environmental laws. This research is aimed to identify the main factors affecting the failure of the enforcement of the Environment Law as well as other environmental laws and regulations. In addressing the said issues, this research utilizes the normative legal research methodology towards secondary data consisting of environmental laws, analyzed using the qualitative data analysis methodology. In conclusion, ineffectiveness of Indonesian environment laws are due to weakness in its enforcement, ambiguity in its norms, and failure of Indonesian legal culture to adhere to its legal principles.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published in Equality: Journal of Law and Justice are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
User Rights
Under this license, users are permitted to:
- Read and access the content freely
- Download and copy the material in any medium or format
- Distribute and share the work
- Adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material
- Use the work for commercial and non-commercial purposes
Conditions
Users must comply with the following terms:
- Attribution — Proper credit must be given to the author(s), a link to the license must be provided, and any changes made must be indicated.
- ShareAlike — Any derivative works must be distributed under the same license (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- No Additional Restrictions — Users may not apply legal or technological measures that restrict others from exercising the rights granted by the license.
Author Rights
- Authors retain copyright and full publishing rights
- Authors grant the journal the right of first publication
- Authors may distribute their work elsewhere with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
Journal Rights
- The journal has the right to publish, distribute, and archive the articles
- The journal maintains the integrity of the version of record
Disclaimer
- The journal is not responsible for third-party reuse of the content
- The responsibility for the content lies entirely with the authors
License URL
For full details of the license, please visit:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
References
Ab. Halim, Mustafa ‘Afifi, and Shabrina Zata Amni. 2023. “Legal System in the Perspectives of H.L.A Hart and Lawrence M. Friedman.” Peradaban Journal of Law and Society 2 (1): 51–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v2i1.83.
Acharya, Suman. 2019. “Legitimacy vs. Autonomy of Law.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339237.
Adi, Rianto. 2021. Sosiologi Hukum: Kajian Hukum Secara Sosiologis. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Ajayi, Victor Oluwatosin. 2023. “A Review on Primary Sources of Data and Secondary Sources of Data.” European Journal of Education and Pedagogy 2 (3): 1–3. DOI: 19810.21091/ejedu.
Ameri, Taylor, Kyle A. Burgason, Matt DeLisi, Mark H. Heirigs, Andy Hochstetler, and Michael G. Vaughn. 2019. “Legal Cynicism: Independent Construct or Downstream Manifestation of Antisocial Constructs? New Evidence.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 64 (May): 211–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.04.008.
Awang, Zainuddin. 2012. Research Methodology and Data Analysis. Selangor: Universiti Teknologi MARA.
Concha-Salgado, Andrés, Angélica Ramírez, Beatriz Pérez, Ricardo Pérez-Luco, and Eduardo García-Cueto. 2022. “Moral Disengagement as a Self-Regulatory Cognitive Process of Transgressions: Psychometric Evidence of the Bandura Scale in Chilean Adolescents.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (19). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912249.
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hariandja, Richaldo. 2024. “Kebakaran Hutan Banyak Untuk Pembukaan Lahan?” Mongabay. August 21, 2024. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2024/08/21/kebakaran-hutan-dan-lahan-karena-pembukaan-lahan/.
Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. JDIH Mahkamah Agung RI. Jakarta.
Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Indonesia. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2001 tentang Pengendalian Kerusakan dan/atau Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup yang berkaitan dengan Kebakaran Hutan dan/atau Lahan. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2001 Number 10, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4076. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2009 Number 130, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5059. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1999 Number 167, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3888. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Jamaludin, Nurul Nadia, and Muslihah Hasbullah. 2020. “WHY PEOPLE VIOLATE THE LAW? A REVIEW OF LITERATURE ON LEGAL SOCIALIZATION.” Asian Journal of Law and Governance 1 (2): 15–23. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajlg/article/view/8166/3446.
Pratiwi, Endang, Theo Negoro, and Hassanain Haykal. 2022. “Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum?” Jurnal Konstitusi 19 (2): 268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1922.
Rochman, Saepul, Kelik Wardiono, and Khudzaifah Dimyati. 2019. “The Ontology of Legal Science: Hans Kelsen’s Proposal of the ‘Pure Theory of Law.’” PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 5 (3): 543–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n3.a8.
Starr, William C. 1984. “Law and Morality in H.L.A Hart’s Legal Philosophy.” Marquette Law Review 67 (3): 673–89. https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol67/iss4/8/.
SuaraNTB. 2024. “BPBD Sebut Kebakaran Hutan Di Kabupaten Bima Telah Padam.” Suara NTB. July 30, 2024. https://suarantb.com/2024/07/30/bpbd-sebut-kebakaran-hutan-di-kabupaten-bima-telah-padam/.
Suhaimi. 2018. “PROBLEM HUKUM DAN PENDEKATAN DALAM PENELITIAN HUKUM NORMATIF.” Jurnal YUSTITIA 19 (2): 202–10. DOI: 10.53712/yustitia.v19i2.477.
Sumarna, Dadang, and Ayyub Kadriah. 2023. “Penelitian Kualitatif Terhadap Hukum Empiris.” Jurnal Serambi Hukum 16 (02): 101–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v16i02.730.
Supriadi. 2010. Hukum Lingkungan Di Indonesia: Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Zainuddin, Muhammad, and Aisyah Dinda Karina. 2023. “PENGGUNAAN METODE YURIDIS NORMATIF DALAM MEMBUKTIKAN KEBENARAN PADA PENELITIAN HUKUM.” Smart Law Journal 2 (2): 114–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34310/slj.v2i2.26.