Analisis Yuridis Hak Pasien Terhadap Akses dan Kerahasiaan Rekam Medis Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam
Bilah Samping Artikel
Medical Record Confidentiality,
Positive Law and Islamic Law Hak Pasien,
Kerahasiaan Rekam Medis,
Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
This study examines positive law and Islamic law regarding patients' rights to access and confidentiality of medical records. Health is a crucial component of human life that requires special attention, both in terms of healthcare services and the protection of patients' rights. The right to access and confidentiality of medical records is one of the essential rights held by patients. Medical records encompass all of a patient's medical history, including diagnoses, treatments, and health conditions. Given the unique nature of this research subject, the method employed is a normative juridical descriptive analysis. This study adopts a comparative approach and focuses on primary legal materials, including theories, concepts, principles, and relevant legal regulations. It is recognized as a library research approach, which involves collecting data from literature, legislation, and book studies. According to Islamic law, strong confidentiality is required to uphold patients' rights to access their medical records. Although patients have the right to know what is recorded in their medical records, doctors and healthcare providers must ensure that this information is not used unethically or in violation of the patient's privacy. Among the universal humanitarian values is the right of patients to access their medical records and the protection of their confidentiality. Both Islamic law and positive law emphasize the importance of maintaining a balance between patients' rights to know their medical information and the obligation of healthcare providers to safeguard the confidentiality of that information. This principle aims to protect patients' rights, preserve their dignity, and build trust between patients and healthcare professionals
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published in Equality: Journal of Law and Justice are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
User Rights
Under this license, users are permitted to:
- Read and access the content freely
- Download and copy the material in any medium or format
- Distribute and share the work
- Adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material
- Use the work for commercial and non-commercial purposes
Conditions
Users must comply with the following terms:
- Attribution — Proper credit must be given to the author(s), a link to the license must be provided, and any changes made must be indicated.
- ShareAlike — Any derivative works must be distributed under the same license (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- No Additional Restrictions — Users may not apply legal or technological measures that restrict others from exercising the rights granted by the license.
Author Rights
- Authors retain copyright and full publishing rights
- Authors grant the journal the right of first publication
- Authors may distribute their work elsewhere with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
Journal Rights
- The journal has the right to publish, distribute, and archive the articles
- The journal maintains the integrity of the version of record
Disclaimer
- The journal is not responsible for third-party reuse of the content
- The responsibility for the content lies entirely with the authors
License URL
For full details of the license, please visit:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Referensi
Daftar Pustaka
Bagaskara, Made Bayu, A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Luh Putu Suryani. “‘Tanggung Jawab Rumah Sakit Terhadap Kerahasiaan Rekam Medis (Medic Record) Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19.’” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 4, no. 1 (2022): 26–30.
Dachban, Yohnly Boelian, Redyanto Sidi, and Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih. “Tantangan Permenkes No 24 Tahun 2022.” Ners 7, no. 1 (2023): 232–39.
Ismatullah, Nurul Khatimah, Yuliani Winarti, Henny Saida Flora, Anggraeni Endah Kusumaningrum, Endah Syamsuriansyah, Endah Labaty Silapurna, Atika Mima Amalin, et al. Pranata Rekam Medis. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 2023.
Malaria, Kemenkes. “Permenkes RI No 22 Tahun 2022.” Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2018 151, no. 2 (2018): 10–17.
Mendoza, Senén D., Eliza S. Nieweglowska, Sutharsan Govindarajan, Lina M. Leon, Joel D. Berry, Anika Tiwari, Vorrapon Chaikeeratisak, et al. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KERAHASIAAN DATA KESEHATAN PASIEN BERDASARKAN UU NO 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN.” Nature Microbiology 3, no. 1 (2020): 641. http://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/ah.
Menkes RI. “Undang - Undang RI Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 Tentang Praktik Kedokteran.” Undang - Undang RI Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 Tentang Praktik Kedokteran, 2004, 4–7.
PERMENKES RI No 269/MENKES/PER/III/2008. “Permenkes Ri 269/MENKES/PER/III/2008.” Permenkes Ri No 269/Menkes/Per/Iii/2008, 2008.
Republik Indonesia. “Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Perlindungan Konsumen.” Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999, no. 8 (1999): 1–19.
Siregar, Rospita Adelina. “182-Article Text-970-1-10-20240219.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren 5, no. 2 (2024): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v5i2.182.
Sitanggang, Tiromsi. “Aspek Hukum Kepemilikan Rekam Medis Ihubungkan Dengan Perlindungan Hak Pasien.” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora 2, no. 1 (2021): 198–221. https://jurnal-lp2m.umnaw.ac.id/index.php/JP2SH/article/view/185.
Solihan. “Persetujuan Pasien Terhadap Tindakan Medis Dokter Dari Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia.” Jurnal Al-Himayah 6, no. 1 (2022): 55–73. http://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/ah.
Terapeutik, Perjanjian, Informed Consent, K U H Perdata, K U H Perdata, K U H Perdata, Undang-undang Perkawinan No, K U H Perdata, K U H Perdata, and K U H Perdata. “Perjanjian Teraupetik,” 1974, 1–8.