Evaluation of the Impact of Corporate Social Innovation Using the Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol Method in the Seloka Batik Group
Article Sidebar
Impact Evaluation,
QuIP,
SROI Corporate Social Innovation,
Evaluasi dampak,
QuIP,
SROI
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study evaluates the Batik Seloka Group Program's impact on the community using the Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (QUIP) method and identifies ways to strengthen the company's Social Innovation and Social Return on Investment (SROI) report for PROPER Emas. The main issues are high unemployment rates among the productive age group in Adipala Sub-district, the obstruction of batik sales due to Covid-19, and the need to improve batik skills. Using the QuIP approach, the impact of the Corporate Social Innovation program on the Batik Seloka group in Adipala Village, Cilacap Regency, was assessed. Eight semi-structured interviews and two Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were conducted. Thematic analysis was used for data processing. Findings show a positive impact but highlight the need for improvements in environmental awareness and digitalization support. SROI and Social Innovation reports have potential bias and lack qualitative exploration. QuIP and SROI methods can complement each other, with SROI providing a framework for monetization and financial analysis, while QuIP offers a holistic approach to identify broader impacts. QuIP can reduce pro-project bias, providing a more accurate picture of program success in social innovation reports.
Article Details
References
Apriyanti, R., & Mutia, T. (2018). Dampak Industri Bata Merah Terhadap Kondisi Lahan di Desa Kesik Kecamatan Masbagik Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Geodika: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Dan Pendidikan Geografi, 2(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.29408/geodika.v2i1.874
Cooksy, L. J., Gill, P., & Kelly, P. A. (2001). The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(01)00003-9
Copestake, J., Davies, G., & Remnant, F. (2019). Generating credible evidence of social impact using the Qualitative Impact Protocol (QuIP): the challenge of positionality in data coding and analysis. Qualitative Research Symposium. https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/files/195299460/QRS_2019_Copestake_final.pdf
Courtney, P., & Powell, J. (2020). Evaluating innovation in European rural development programmes: Application of the social return on investment (SROI) method. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072657
D. Smith, J., H. Li, D., & R. Rafferty, M. (2020). The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects. Implementation Science, 15, 1–12.
Dionisio, M., & de Vargas, E. R. (2020). Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review. International Business Review, 29(2), 101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101641
Gareth, T., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(25), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.7441/978-80-7454-682-2_4
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838–849. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400227
Kwatra, P., Singh, N., Pandey, A., & Sahay, A. (2016). CSR as a strategy in Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited. Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies, 6(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/EEMCS-03-2016-0034
Morsink, M., Pakasi, D., Az Zahro, F., Asnani, Harmanto, B., Putri, R. Me., Mahendra, I. G. A. A., Suandana, I. A., Septyaning Rahayu Ariesta Semarang, P., Muzir, S. M., Agnesia, L., & Syarifah, D. A. (2021). QuIP Report on Rutgers’ SETARA Programme in Indonesia. 0–89. https://rutgers.international/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/QuIP-Report_Setara-FINAL-for-publication-1.pdf
Najmah, Namirah, A., Citra, A. S., & Azmiya, R. Z. (2023). Analisis Tematik Pada Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(August), 128.
Păunescu, C. (2014). Current trends in social innovation research: Social capital, corporate social responsibility, impact measurement. Management and Marketing, 9(2), 103–116.
W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic Model Development Guide.
Widyaningrum, A., Hidayanto, T., & Purnomo, G. E. (2023). Implementasi Corporate Social Responsibility PLTU Jateng 2 Adipala Cilacap Pada Kelompok Batik Seloka. Madani : Indonesian Journal of Civil Society, 5(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.35970/madani.v5i2.2019
Zulaihati, S., & Susanti, S. (2020). Sustainability Cooperative Business in Vocational High School in Jakarta: Application of the Sustainability Compass Theory. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9(3), 278–285.